Documentation Revision Date: 2019-10-30
Dataset Version: 1
Summary
There is one comma-separated (.csv) data file with this dataset.
Citation
Hinson, A.L., R.A. Feagin, and M. Eriksson. 2019. Tidal Wetlands Soil Organic Carbon and Estuarine Characteristics, USA, 1972-2015. ORNL DAAC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1742
Table of Contents
- Dataset Overview
- Data Characteristics
- Application and Derivation
- Quality Assessment
- Data Acquisition, Materials, and Methods
- Data Access
- References
Dataset Overview
This dataset provides a synthesis of soil organic carbon estimates and a variety of other environmental information from tidal wetlands within estuaries in the conterminous United States for the period 1972-2015. The data were compiled from several existing data resources and include the following: soil organic carbon stock estimates, the proportion of the catchment area containing the wetlands that is barren, tidal wetland area, nontidal wetland land, open water, saltwater zone, mixed zone, agricultural, urban, forest, and wetland areas, land elevation, ocean salinity, sea surface temperature (sst), ocean dissolved inorganic phosphorus, estuary latitude, longitude, depth, perimeter, salinity, and estuary volume, river flow, carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus river flux, sediment organic carbon content, windspeed, mean temperature, daily and mean precipitation, frost days, and the population within each catchment. Estuaries were also classified to one of six typological categories. Coastal locations were determined by natural environmental and political divisions within the US. The data were used to investigate how tidal wetland soil organic carbon (SOC) density is distributed across the continental US among various coastal locations, estuarine typologies, vegetation types, water regimes, and management regimes, and to identify whether SOC density is correlated with different environmental variables. The analytical results are not included with this dataset.
Project: North American Carbon Program (NACP)
The North American Carbon Program (NACP) is a multidisciplinary research program to obtain scientific understanding of North America's carbon sources and sinks and of changes in carbon stocks needed to meet societal concerns and to provide tools for decision makers. The NACP is supported by a number of different federal agencies. The central objective is to measure and understand the sources and sinks of Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Carbon Monoxide (CO) in North America and in adjacent ocean regions.
Related Publication:
Hinson, A.L., Feagin, R.A., and Eriksson, M. (2019). Environmental Controls on the Distribution of Tidal Wetland Soil Organic Carbon in the Continental United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. DOI: 10.1029/2019GB006179
Acknowledgements:
This research was supported by the NASA Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Program (Grant number NNX14AM37G), and the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Project (Grant Number NN14AY67I).
Data Characteristics
Spatial Coverage: Estuaries and coastal areas in the Continental US
Spatial Resolution: Multiple points
Temporal Coverage: 1972-01-01 to 2015-12-31
Temporal Resolution: Annual estimates
Study Areas (All latitude and longitude given in decimal degrees)
Site | Westernmost Longitude | Easternmost Longitude | Northernmost Latitude | Southernmost Latitude |
---|---|---|---|---|
Estuaries and coastal areas in the Continental US | -124.385 | -67.0547 | 47.82224 | 25.18731 |
Data File Information
There is one data file in comma-separated (.csv) format with this dataset: tidal_wetland_estuaries.csv
This file provides estuarine data for the continental United States tidal wetlands for the period 1972 -2015. The data were compiled from several existing data sources (see Table 2) or were calculated.
Table 1. Variables in tidal_wetland_estuaries.csv
Variable name | Units | Description |
---|---|---|
edacda | Letter followed by 3 numbers | Estuary and coastal drainage areas code consisting of a letter followed by 3 numbers; example, G120, from CAF |
name | Estuary name from CAF | |
coast | Coast location from CoBluCarb | |
wet_area | km2 | Total tidal wetland area from CoBluCarb |
stock_0-15_low | Tg | SOC stock low estimate from CoBluCarb |
stock_0-15_high | Tg | SOC stock high estimate (0-15cm depth) from CoBluCarb |
awd_0-15 | g/cm3 | Area weighted SOC density (0-15cm depth) from CoBluCarb |
estu_area | m2 | Estuary area (open water area) calculated from AREA_MI2 attribute from CAF database |
estu_latitude | decimal degrees | Center point latitude for estuary (centroid Y) |
estu_longitude | decimal degrees | Center point longitude for estuary (centroid X) |
estu_depth | m | Estuary depth from digital bathymetric chart if available; otherwise NOAA planimetry (est_z = V/water_area) |
estu_perimeter | m | Estuary perimeter |
land_area | m2 | Land area (drainage area) calculated from AREA_MI2 attribute from CAF database |
land_latitude | decimal degrees | Center point latitude for catchment (centroid Y) |
land_longitude | decimal degrees | Center point longitude for catchment (centroid X) |
land_mean_elev | m | Mean catchment elevation calculated from catchment shapefiles + Hydro1K (a global 1-km grid of elevation) |
land_max_elev | m | Maximum catchment elevation calculated from catchment shapefiles + Hydro1K (a global 1-km grid of elevation) |
urban_area | m2 | USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
agri_area | m2 | Agricultural area: USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
forest_area | m2 | Forested area: USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
nontidal_wetl_area | m2 | Nontidal wetland area: USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
range_area | m2 | Range area: USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
barren_area | m2 | Barren, non-vegetated area: USGS Land Use and Land Cover (LUDA) for entire watershed 1972 with CENSUS 1990 information, base year early 1990s |
population | Population within each catchment; based on gridded (1-km) US 1990 census data, corrected for catchments extending outside US (with LANDSCAN) | |
tide_ht | m | NOAA estimate of tide height, back-calculated from tide volume; in some cases guessed from nearby systems |
daily_precip | m3/d | Direct precipitation on system, derived from PRISM shapefile |
daily_evap | m3/d | Direct evaporation from system, derived from LOICZ 0.5 degree database |
freshwater_area | m2 | Tidal Fresh area, calculated from NOAA shapefiles |
mix_area | m2 | Mixing Zone area, calculated from NOAA shapefiles |
saltwater_area | m2 | Saltwater area, calculated from NOAA shapefiles |
estu_salinity | psu | Based on NOAA estimate of freshwater volume |
ocean_salinity_mean | psu | From LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
ocean_salinity_max | psu | From LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
ocean_salinity_min | psu | From LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
air_temp_mean | degrees C | Mean air temperature for estuary, derived from LOICZ 0.5 degree database |
frost_days_per_yr | Number of frost days per year for estuary, derived from LOICZ 0.5 degree database | |
windspeed | m/s | Estuary windspeed derived from LOICZ 0.5 degree database |
ocean_sst_mean | degrees C | Mean ocean sea surface temperature from LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
ocean_diss_inorg_p | uM | Ocean dissolved inorganic phosphorous from LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
ocean_no3 | uM | Ocean nitrate from LOICZ 0.5 degree database, originally from World Ocean Atlas, ANNUAL ESTIMATE FOR OPEN SHELF |
typl_1 | Estuarine Typology: R: former river valley primary estuary, G: former glacier valley primary estuary, D: river delta primary estuary, T: tectonic structural primary estuary, S: coastal lagoon secondary estuary, and U: unclassified estuary | |
wetland_area | m2 | Tidal Wetland Area |
river_flow | m3/d | Freshwater Inflow (from SPARROW) |
river_total_n_flux | mol/d | Mean daily river total nitrogen flux (from SPARROW) |
river_total_c_flux_total_wetl | mol/d | Daily river influx of total organic carbon including approximate load from tidal wetlands (from SPARROW) |
sparrow_total_wet_area | m2 | Tidal wetland area (from SPARROW) |
river_tot_p_flux | mol/d | Mean total influx of daily phosphorous (from SPARROW) |
estu_vol | m3 | Estuarine depth by the estuarine area (estu_depth * estu_area) |
tide_vol | m3 | Tide volume: (tide_ht * estu_area) |
tide_flow | m3/d | The tidal flow: (tide_vol * tides_per_day) |
tau_salt | d | Residence time: (estu_vol/(river_flow + daily_precip - daily_evap) * (1-estu_salinity/ ocean_salinity_mean) |
tau_flush | d | The estuarine flushing time estimated by: Flushing Time = estu vol/(tidal flow + river flow) |
mean_precip | inch | Precipitation (30-yr avg) spatially calculated from PRISM based on CoBluCarb boundaries |
mean_temp | degrees C | Temperature (30-yr avg) spatially calculated from PRISM based on CoBluCarb boundaries |
Application and Derivation
Tidal wetlands contain relatively high quantities of soil organic carbon. Estuarine-level analysis could provide a better understanding for the conditions that lead to enhanced or degraded carbon sequestration rates in times of rapid global change and could lead to future conservation efforts within specific estuarine boundaries.
In Hinson et al. (2019), tidal wetland SOC density was investigated in conjunction with associated environmental characteristics. The data used are provided in this dataset.
Quality Assessment
Normality and heteroscedasticity is discussed in detail in the paper associated with the data. For any direct uncertainty data, the original source of the data should be referenced.
Data Acquisition, Materials, and Methods
Following is a brief synopsis of the data compilation and derivation activities. Please see Hinson et al. (2019) for details and additional data source information.
Data compilation
Identifiers and geographic variables
The variables originated from, or were calculated from, the National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment (NEEA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Coastal Assessment Framework (CAF), and the United States Geographical Survey’s SPAtially Referenced Regressions On Watershed attributes (SPARROW) (Table 2). The values for each variable were sourced from the CAF dataset, unless otherwise explicitly stated. The set of environmental variables that varied by coordinates and geographic boundaries (considered geographic variable set) included the total catchment size (total watershed basin), estuary latitude and longitude (for the estuarine waters portion of the catchment only), the estuarine area (the open water area only), the land area (drainage area only), the tidal wetland area (from CoBluCarb database), the tidal wetland area (from SPARROW), the average tidal height, the tidal volume, and the tidal flow (the tidal volume divided by the tides per day).
Soil organic carbon
SOC densities were aggregated separately for each scale from United States SOC database, CoBluCarb (Hinson et al.,2017; see also https://bluecarbon.tamu.edu). This database was created using spatially explicit data from United States Department of Agriculture’s Soil Survey Database (SSURGO) and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) database. In Hinson et al. (2017), all methods and assumptions for CoBluCarb are discussed.
Coastal location
The coastal location factor was determined by natural environmental and political divisions within the US. The individual wetlands on the East and West Coast are primarily arrayed across latitude, whereas those on the Gulf Coast are primarily arrayed across longitude. The division between the East and Gulf Coasts in southern Florida was based on county lines closest to the tip of the Florida Peninsula.
Estuarine typology
Based on the estuarine typology descriptions described in Bianchi (2007), there were six estuarine typological levels considered:
(1) former river valley primary estuary (n=170,194),
(2) former glacier valley primary estuary (n=12,049),
(3) river delta primary estuary (n=19,916),
(4) tectonic structural primary estuary (n=5,132),
(5) coastal lagoon secondary estuary (n=144,666), and
(6) unclassified estuary (n=27,932).
These six levels were also grouped into primary (n=207,291) and secondary estuary systems (n=144,666). Coastal drainage areas (CDA) (n=56,677) were added for additional analysis (Figure1). The Coastal Assessment Framework (or ‘CAF’ dataset, National Ocean Service) defines both estuarine (EDAs) and coastal drainage areas (CDAs). The majority of tidal wetlands fall within the EDAs and the Bianchi (2007) typology is one possible method to group them (Hinson et al., 2019).
Oceanic variables
The oceanic variables included the ocean salinity (minimum, mean, and maximum), sea surface temperature (mean), ocean nitrate, ocean dissolved inorganic phosphorus, estuarine salinity (mean), estuarine depth, estuarine perimeter, saltwater zone area, mixed zone area, freshwater tidal area, estuarine volume (estuarine depth by the estuarine area), estuarine residence time, and estuarine flushing time. The equation used to determine estuarine residence time was:
Residence time = EST. vol / (riv.flow + daily precip-daily evap) *(1-est sal/mean ocean sal)
For this equation, the daily precipitation was derived from the NEEA.
The estuarine flushing time was estimated by:
Flushing Time = EST vol/(tidal flow + river flow)
Catchment and riverine variables
The terrestrial variables included the proportion of the catchment area containing the wetlands that is barren (non-vegetated) land, rangeland, non-tidal wetland, forested area, agricultural area, and urban area, the population within each catchment, the maximum and mean catchment elevations, daily freshwater inflow quantity (mean), daily riverine flux of total nitrogen (mean), daily riverine flux of total organic carbon (mean), daily riverine influx of total organic carbon including approximate load from tidal wetlands, and the daily riverine influx of total phosphorous (mean). All river-related variables were derived from the SPARROW dataset.
Meteorological variables
The atmospheric set of variables included the 30-year averages for precipitation and temperature (both modeled from Oregon State PRISM, 2017), daily evaporation, wind speed, air temperature (mean), daily precipitation, and frost days per year (latter five were determined from the NEEA database) (Hinson et al., 2019).
Table 2. Data sources
CAF: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2012. Coastal Assessment Framework. http://coastalgeospatial.noaa.gov/ or http://coastalsocioeconomics.noaa.gov. |
CoBluCarb: Hinson, A. L., Feagin, R. A., Eriksson, M., Najjar, R. G., Herrmann, M., Bianchi, T. S.,et al. (2017). The spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in tidal wetland soils of the continental United States. Global Change Biology, 23(12), 5468-5480. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13811 |
Land Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone (LOICZ): https://ian.umces.edu/loicz/ or http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/organizations/?id=87 |
LANDSCAN: https://landscan.ornl.gov/ |
NEEA: National Estuarine Eutrophication Assessment (NEEA). Available at https://ian.umces.edu/neea/ |
SPARROW: Schwarz, G.E., Hoos, A.B., Alexander, R.B., and Smith, R.A., 2006, The SPARROW Surface Water-Quality Model—Theory, Applications and User Documentation: U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods 6–B3, 248 p. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2006/tm6b3/ |
PRISM: PRISM Climate Group. (2017). PRISM Climate Data. 1991-2017, 2017 |
USGS Land Cover: https://archive.usgs.gov/archive/sites/landcover.usgs.gov/usgslandcover.html |
Data Access
These data are available through the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).
Tidal Wetlands Soil Organic Carbon and Estuarine Characteristics, USA, 1972-2015
Contact for Data Center Access Information:
- E-mail: uso@daac.ornl.gov
- Telephone: +1 (865) 241-3952
References
Bianchi, T.S. (2007). Biogeochemistry of estuaries. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hinson, A.L., Feagin, R.A., and Eriksson, M. (2019). Environmental Controls on the Distribution of Tidal Wetland Soil Organic Carbon in the Continental United States. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. DOI: 10.1029/2019GB006179
Hinson, A.L., R.A. Feagin, M. Eriksson, R.G. Najjar, M. Herrmann, T.S. Bianchi, M. Kemp, J.A. Hutchings. S. Crooks, and T. Boutton. 2017. The spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in tidal wetland soils of the continental United States. Global Change Biology,23(12),5468-5480. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13811