The Leaf Angle Data Data Set contains leaf angle distributions (LAD) obtained during the 1987 growing season for ten types of plant canopies, from the Konza Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) area. These data were collected using a direct measurement technique (i.e., a Spatial Coordinate Apparatus (SCA)). The species selected were major species common on the prairie with the leaves were of sufficient size to allow SCA measurement.
The objective of this study was to obtain detailed LAD information on the major canopy species of the tallgrass prairie and selected agricultural crops. The LAD information for specific canopies can be used as input for a canopy radiation model. Canopy leaf orientation is an important parameter for plant growth modeling. Four categories of zenith angle distributions were found among the 14 species. These were planophile, plagiophile, erectophile, and uniform. Some canopies were found to have non-uniform leaf azimuth angle distribution. Also there were deferences between the upper and lower parts of the canopies for some species.
Leaf Angle Data (FIFE).
(Leaf Angle Data).
The Leaf Angle Data Data Set contains leaf angle distributions (LAD) obtained during the 1987 growing season for ten types of plant canopies, from the Konza Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) area. These data were collected using a direct measurement technique (i.e., a Spatial Coordinate Apparatus (SCA)).
In this study, leaf angle distributions (LAD) were obtained for ten plant species from a tallgrass prairie using a direct measurement technique developed by Lang (1973). The objective of this study was to obtain detailed LAD information on the major canopy species of the tallgrass prairie and selected agricultural crops. The LAD information for specific canopies can be used as input for a canopy radiation model.
Zenith Angle, Azimuth Angle, Percent Leaf Area and Total Leaf Area.
Canopy leaf orientation is an important parameter for plant growth modeling. A leaf surface may be approximately represented by a set of continuous triangles (Lang 1973). In this study direct measurements of the leaf angle distribution of 10 types of plant canopies, from the Konza Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) area, were taken during the 1987 growing season, using a Spatial Coordinate Apparatus (SCA). The species selected were major species common on the prairie with the leaves were of sufficient size to allow SCA measurement.
Distributions of the direct measurements are reported in this data set. Four categories of zenith angle distributions were found among the 14 species. These were planophile, plagiophile, erectophile, and uniform. Some canopies were found to have non-uniform leaf azimuth angle distribution. Also there were deference's between the upper and lower parts of the canopies for some species.
LEAF_ANGLE_DATA.
Dr. Yuangui Li
Keystone Lab Houston
Staff Science Data Acquisition Program.
Contact 1:
Dr. Yuangui Li
Keystone Lab Houston
Houston, TX
Tel. (713) 975-2728
The Leaf Angle Data were collected and analyzed by Dr. Yuangui Li as part of his Ph.D. dissertation work at Kansas State University.
In this study, each leaf was divided into several continuous triangles. Within each triangle, the surface was flat enough to be presented by one normal. This study used the Spatial Coordinate Apparatus (SCA), to obtain the coordinates of the apices of each triangle, which were then used to calculate the "area" and "normal" of the upper surface of each triangle in terms of its zenith and azimuth angles.
The instrument used in this study is called the Spatial Coordinate Apparatus (SCA) (Lang 1973). The SCA consists of four arms connected to potentiometers. The top three arms can move in a vertical plane while the fourth arm can rotate upon its longitudinal axis. As the arms rotate, the angles of the rotation are measured in terms of voltages from the potentiometers and recorded in a computer. These voltage readings were then converted into 3-dimensional coordinates (x, y, z) of the endpoint of the top arm.
Ground-based.
Not available at this revision.
To measure leaf zenith angle and leaf azimuth angle in a plant canopy.
Leaf zenith angle and leaf azimuth angle.
A leaf surface may be approximately represented by a set of contiguous triangles so that when the coordinates of apices of each triangle are determined the leaves are completely defined in space. The greater the number of triangles the better the approximation.
The SCA instrument consists of four arms which are pivoted so that they moved in effect in a single plane, while the angles between the arms are measured by potentiometers.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Leaf Angle distribution measurements were conducted on ten plant species using the Spatial Coordinate Apparatus. The measurements were made at the Konza Long Term Ecological Research Area. Measurements were taken at about full canopy for each species. A large number of leaves were measured plant by plant and the number of plants measured ranged from 20 to 100 depending on the size of leaf. During the measurements, plants were shielded from the wind by using plastic boards, thereby reducing the leaf movement. Since a leaf surface is usually not flat, it is not adequate to assume one normal for each leaf.
Not available.
None available at this revision.
The FIFE study area, with areal extent of 15 km by 15 km, is located south of the Tuttle Reservoir and Kansas River, and about 10 km from Manhattan, Kansas, USA. The northwest corner of the area has UTM coordinates of 4,334,000 Northing and 705,000 Easting in UTM Zone 14.
Not applicable since this is a non-geographic data set.
Not available.
The total leaf area for a species is reported in square cm.
Not available.
Not available.
The leaf angle distribution measurements were made at approximately noon on 7 selected dates between June 9, 1987 and August 4, 1987.
Not available.
Not applicable.
The SQL definition for this table is found in the LEAF_ANG.TDF file located on CD-ROM Volume 1.
Parameter/Variable Name
Parameter/Variable Description Range Units Source
SITEGRID_ID This is a FIS grid location code. FIS Site grid codes (SSEE-III) give the south (SS) and east (EE) cell number in a 100 x 100 array of 200 m square cells. The last 3 characters (III) are an instrument identifier.
STATION_ID The station ID designating the 999 FIS location of the observations.
OBS_DATE The date of the observations. min = 09-JUN-87 FIS max = 04-AUG-87
DISTRIBUTION_TYPE This is the type of distribution min = AZIMUTH, FIS of the leaf angle measurements, max = ZENITH ZENITH or AZIMUTH.
LEAF_BIN_CENTER_ANG The center angle of the bin min = 0, [degrees] FIS distribution of leaves. There are max = 360, 10 zenith bins (9 degrees each) missing = -99.9 and 10 azimuth bins (36 degrees each).
LTER_SPECIES_CODE The LTER species code. More 2, FIS information on this species can be 15, found in the VEG_SPECIES_REF table. 18, 41, 43, 56, 128, 140, 164, 234
SPECIES_NAME The common name of the plant. 11 names from FIS Big Bluestem to Switchgrass
PRCNT_LEAF_AREA The percent of the total leaf min = 0, [percent] FIS area which is facing the direction max = 0.353 listed in LEAF_BIN_CENTER_ZEN and LEAF_BIN_CENTER_AZIM.
TOTAL_LEAF_AREA The total leaf area measured, in min = 327.17, [cm^2] FIS square cm. max = 3909.98
FIFE_DATA_CRTFCN_CODE * The FIFE Certification Code for CPI=Checked by FIS the data, in the following format: Principal CPI (Certified by PI), CPI-??? Investigator (CPI - questionable data).
LAST_REVISION_DATE data, in the format (DD-MMM-YY). max = 27-JAN-90
Footnotes:
* Valid levels
The primary certification codes are: EXM Example or Test data (not for release) PRE Preliminary (unchecked, use at your own risk) CPI Checked by Principal Investigator (reviewed for quality) CGR Checked by a group and reconciled (data comparisons and cross checks)
The certification code modifiers are: PRE-NFP Preliminary - Not for publication, at the request of investigator. CPI-MRG PAMS data that is "merged" from two separate receiving stations to eliminate transmission errors. CPI-??? Investigator thinks data item may be questionable.
SITEGRID_ID STATION_ID OBS_DATE DISTRIBUTION_TYPE LEAF_BIN_CENTER_ANG ----------- ---------- --------- ----------------- ------------------- FIFE-LAM 99 09-JUN-87 ZENITH 85.500 FIFE-LAM 99 09-JUN-87 ZENITH 76.500 FIFE-LAM 99 09-JUN-87 ZENITH 67.500 FIFE-LAM 99 09-JUN-87 ZENITH 58.500 LTER_SPECIES_CODE SPECIES_NAME PRCNT_LEAF_AREA ----------------- ------------- --------------- 2 BIG BLUESTEM .0090 2 BIG BLUESTEM .0150 2 BIG BLUESTEM .0600 2 BIG BLUESTEM .0410 TOTAL_LEAF_AREA FIFE_DATA_CRTFCN_CODE LAST_REVISION_DATE --------------- --------------------- ------------------ 1371.280 CPI 27-JAN-90 1371.280 CPI 27-JAN-90 1371.280 CPI 27-JAN-90 1371.280 CPI 27-JAN-90
The total leaf area for a species is reported in square cm. The leaf angle distribution measurements were made at approximately noon on 7 selected dates between June 9, 1987 and August 4, 1987.
A general description of data granularity as it applies to the IMS appears in the EOSDIS Glossary.
The CD-ROM file format consists of numerical and character fields of varying length separated by commas. The character fields are enclosed with a single apostrophe. There are no spaces between the fields. Each file begins with five header records. Header records contain the following information: Record 1 Name of this file, its table name, number of records in this file, path and name of the document that describes the data in this file, and name of principal investigator for these data.
Record 2 Path and filename of the previous data set, and path and filename of the next data set. (Path and filenames for files that contain another set of data taken at the same site on the same day.)
Record 3 Path and filename of the previous site, and path and filename of the next site. (Path and filenames for files of the same data set taken on the same day for the previous and next sites (sequentially numbered by SITEGRID_ID)).
Record 4 Path and filename of the previous date, and path and filename of the next date. (Path and filenames for files of the same data set taken at the same site for the previous and next date.)
Record 5 Column names for the data within the file, delimited by commas.
Record 6 Data records begin.
Each field represents one of the attributes listed in the chart in the Data Characteristics Section and described in detail in the TDF file. These fields are in the same order as in the chart.
The measured leaf azimuth angles and leaf zenith angles were distributed into bins based their angle values. The azimuth angle bins have an interval of 36 degrees. The zenith angle bins have an interval of 9.5 degrees. The angle values for the center of the bin is reported for both leaf azimuth angles and leaf zenith angles.
The percent leaf area for each directional class was calculated by dividing the area in each directional class by the total measured leaf area.
The Switchgrass canopy was divided into upper and lower halves to examine the difference in leaf angle distributions between the two.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
For each selected species, corresponding pairs of azimuth and zenith angles of measured areas were plotted as points in polar coordinates to show the relative position of each measured area with respect to the solar position. The leaf angle distributions were calculated by first classifying the measured areas by their normal directions. These areas were then summed and the area in each directional class was divided by the total measured area. The canopy for Switchgrass was further analysis by dividing the canopy into upper and lower halves to see the differences in leaf angle distributions between the two.
Not available at this revision.
None.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
The precision of the measurement was estimated by repeatedly measuring areas of 2 cm square with known azimuth and zenith angle. The relative error was found to be 6.7%. It should be noted that this relative error decreases as the size of measured area increases.
Not available at this revision.
The data verification performed by the ORNL DAAC deals with the quality of the data format, media, and readability. The ORNL DAAC does not make an assessment of the quality of the data itself except during the course of performing other QA procedures as described below.
The FIFE data were transferred to the ORNL DAAC via CD-ROM. These CD-ROMs are distributed by the ORNL DAAC unmodified as a set or in individual volumes, as requested. In addition, the DAAC has incorporated each of the 98 FIFE tabular datasets from the CD-ROMs into its online data holdings. Incorporation of these data involved the following steps:
Each distinct type of data (i.e. "data set" on the CD-ROM), is accompanied by a documentation file (i.e., .doc file) and a data format/structure definition file (i.e., .tdf file). The data format files on the CD-ROM are Oracle SQL commands (e.g., "create table") that can be used to set up a relational database table structure. This file provides column/variable names, character/numeric type, length, and format, and labels/comments. These SQL commands were converted to SAS code and were used to create SAS data sets and subsequently to input data files directly from the CD-ROM into a SAS dataset. During this process, file names and directory paths were captured and metadata was extracted to the extent possible electronically. No files were found to be corrupted or unreadable during the conversion process.
Additional Quality Assurance procedures were performed as follows:
As errors are discovered in the online tabular data by investigators, users, or DAAC staff, corrections are made in cooperation with the principal investigators. These corrections are then distributed to users. CD-ROM data are corrected when re-mastering occurs for replenishment of CD-ROM stock.
Not available.
None reported at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
Not available at this revision.
The LAD information for specific canopies can be used as input for a canopy radiation model.
The FIFE field campaigns were held in 1987 and 1989 and there are no plans for new data collection. Field work continues near the FIFE site at the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network Konza research site (i.e., LTER continues to monitor the site). The FIFE investigators are continuing to analyze and model the data from the field campaigns to produce new data products.
Software to access the data set is available on the all volumes of the FIFE CD-ROM set. For a detailed description of the available software see the Software Description Document.
ORNL DAAC User Services
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Telephone: (865) 241-3952
FAX: (865) 574-4665
Email: ornldaac@ornl.gov
ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
USA
Telephone: (865) 241-3952
FAX: (865) 574-4665
Email: ornldaac@ornl.gov
Users may place requests by telephone, electronic mail, or FAX. Data is also available via the World Wide Web at http://daac.ornl.gov.
FIFE data are available from the ORNL DAAC. Please contact the ORNL DAAC User Services Office for the most current information about these data.
Leaf Angle Data are available on FIFE CD-ROM Volume 1. The CD-ROM filename is as follows:
\DATA\BIOLOGY\LEAF_ANG\ydddFIFE.LAD
Note: capital letters indicate fixed values that appear on the CD-ROM exactly as shown here, lower case indicates characters (values) that change for each path and file.
The format used for the filenames is: ydddFIFE.sfx, where y is the last digit of the year (e.g., 7 = 1987, 9 = 1989), and ddd is the day of the year (e.g., 061 = sixty-first day of the year). The filename extension (.sfx), identifies the data set content for the file (see the Data Characteristics Section) and is equal to .LAD for this data set.
Not available at this revision.
Anderson, M.C. 1971. Radiation and crop structure. Plant Photosynthesis Production Manual of Methods. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague. 818 pp.
Bonhomme, R. and P. Chartier. 1972. The interpretation automatic measurement of hemispheric photograph to obtain sunlit foliage area and gap frequency. Isr. J. Agric. Res. 22: 53-61.
Goudriaan, J. 1977. Crop micormeteoroloy: a simulation study. Center for Agricultural Publication and Documentation. Wageningen. pp. 1-249.
Lang, A.R.G. 1973. Leaf orientation of a cotton plant. Agric. Meteorol. 11:37-51.
Lang, A.R.G., X. Yuequin, and J.M. Norman. 1985. Crop structure and the penetration of direct sunlight. Agric. and For. Meteorol. 35:83-101.
Mann, J.E., G.L. Curry, D.W. DeMichele, and D.N. Baker. 1980. Light penetration in a row-crop with random plant spacing. Agron. J. 72:131-142.
Myneni, R.B., G. Asrar, E.T. Kanemasu, D.J. Lawlor, and I. Impens. 1986a. Canopy architecture, irradiance distribution in leaf surfaces and consequent photosynthetic efficiencies in heterogeneous plant canopies. Part I. Theoretical considerations. Agric. and For. Meteorol. 37:189-204.
Myneni, R.B., G. Asrar, E.T. Kanemasu, D.J. Lawlor, and I. Impens. 1986b. Canopy architecture, irradiance distribution in leaf surfaces and consequent photosynthetic efficiencies in heterogeneous plant canopies. Part II. Results and discussion. Agric. and For. Meteorol. 37:205-218.
Norman, J.M. 1982. Simulation of microclimates. Biometeorology and Integrated Pest Management Eds. J.L. Hatfield and I.J. Thomason. Academic Press. NY. pp. 65-99.
Oker-Blom, P. and S. Kellomaki. 1982. Effect of angular distribution of foliage in light absorption and photosynthesis in the plant canopy: theoretical computations. Agric. Meteorol. 26: 105-116.
Perry, S.G. 1985. Remote sensing of plant canopy structure with simple radiation measurements. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA 16802. 199 pp.
Ross, J. 1981. The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands. W. Junk Publishers. The Hague. Boston, London. 391 pp.
Smith, J.A., R.E. Oliver, and J.K. Berry. 1977. A comparison of two photographic techniques for estimating foliage angle distribution. Aust. J. Bot. 25:545-553.
Warren Wilson, W.J. 1959. Analysis of the spatial distribution of foliage by two-dimensional point quadrats. New Phytol. 58:92-101.
Warren Wilson, W.J. 1960. Inclined point Quadrats. New Phytol. 59: 1-8.
Warren Wilson, W.J. 1963. Estimation of foliage denseness and foliage angle by inclined point quadrats. Aust. J. Bot. 11:95-105.
Contact the EOS Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, Tennessee (see the Data Center Identification Section). Documentation about using the archive and/or online access to the data at the ORNL DAAC is not available at this revision.
A general glossary for the DAAC is located at Glossary.
A general list of acronyms for the DAAC is available at Acronyms.
April 24, 1994 (citation revised on October 14, 2002).
Warning: This document has not been checked for technical or editorial accuracy by the FIFE Information Scientist. There may be inconsistencies with other documents, technical or editorial errors that were inadvertently introduced when the document was compiled or references to preliminary data that were not included on the final CD-ROM.
Previous versions of this document have been reviewed by the Principal Investigator, the person who transmitted the data to FIS, a FIS staff member, or a FIFE scientist generally familiar with the data.
December 9, 1996.
ORNL-FIFE_LEAF_ANG.
Li, Y. 1994. Leaf Angle Data (FIFE). Data set. Available on-line [http://www.daac.ornl.gov] from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.A. doi:10.3334/ORNLDAAC/44. Also published in D. E. Strebel, D. R. Landis, K. F. Huemmrich, and B. W. Meeson (eds.), Collected Data of the First ISLSCP Field Experiment, Vol. 1: Surface Observations and Non-Image Data Sets. CD-ROM. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, U.S.A. (available from http://www.daac.ornl.gov).